From: mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman)
Subject: Re: GNAT good for learning?
Date: 30 Nov 1994 18:27:14 -0500
Date: 1994-11-30T18:27:14-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3bj1oi$91@felix.seas.gwu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1994Nov30.191822.20165@roxi.rz.fht-mannheim.de
In article <1994Nov30.191822.20165@roxi.rz.fht-mannheim.de>,
Dirk Zoller <duz@roxi.rz.fht-mannheim.de> wrote:
>How suitable is the GNAT compiler (on Linux or OS/2) for learning Ada?
>The documentation says it's an (incomplete?) Ada 9X compiler while the
>latest standard seems to be Ada 83. Does GNAT conform fully (well, in
>practice) to the Ada 83 standard, or will I experience surprises when
>working e.g. with J.G.B.Barnes' book?
Assuming you are referring to a DOS or OS/2 (as opposed to SunOS)
version of GNAT, you will find big surprises only in the area of
tasking, which exists - at the moment - only on SunOS. There are
other bits and pieces missing, but they are in the "bits and pieces"
category and you can certainly learn substantially all of Ada
(83 or 9X) other than tasking by working withthe current GNAT.
NYU release new versions around once per month, and it gets more
and more complete each time.
If you are interested in learning Ada 83 Barnes-style, you might check
out GW-Ada/Ed, which is full Ada 83 except for some machine dependent
features. I'll send you details by e-mail (others are welcome to write
me for details as well; the net is getting bored, I think, seeing the
announcement over and over).
Mike Feldman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1994-11-30 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1994-11-30 18:18 GNAT good for learning? Dirk Zoller
1994-11-30 23:27 ` Michael Feldman [this message]
1994-12-01 1:42 ` Kenneth Almquist
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox