From: "Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@nospam.baesystems.com>
Subject: Re: Relational Operators
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 09:02:29 -0000
Date: 2001-10-30T09:02:29+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3bde6a8e$1@pull.gecm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9rkaqs$8201@news.cis.okstate.edu
"David Starner" <dvdeug@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu> wrote in message
news:9rkaqs$8201@news.cis.okstate.edu...
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, in comp.lang.ada, Martin Dowie wrote:
> But I don't see wht the LRM reference adds. "Operand of = cannot be
> another relational operation" alone is better than the GNAT message,
> with or without the LRM reference (and I'm really not much interested in
> the functionings of the compiler error-correcting routines.)
Well, in this instance, it would point out to me that I've tried something
I didn't understand, so the LRM pointer at least tells me which area of the
language to bone up on. Even if I can't fathom out what the LRM is saying,
I would then know to go and pull out my Barnes and Cohen books and what
chapters to read!
Just a little slow I guess... :-)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-30 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-26 12:41 Relational Operators Gordon Cooke
2001-10-26 13:57 ` Preben Randhol
2001-10-26 14:42 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-26 14:10 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-29 8:44 ` tgingold
2001-10-29 10:47 ` Martin Dowie
2001-10-29 13:41 ` Pascal Obry
2001-10-29 19:31 ` David Starner
2001-10-30 9:02 ` Martin Dowie [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox