From: "Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@nospam.baesystems.com>
Subject: Re: Which OO is in ??
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 13:33:12 +0100
Date: 2001-08-03T13:33:12+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b6a97c5@pull.gecm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: fb75c450.0108030127.6c60f9a2@posting.google.com
Hambut <hfrumblefoot@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f75c450.0108030127.6c60f9a2@posting.google.com...
> I think it's probably even more straight forward for new projects now.
[snip]
> sub-set. Which may mean that the sub-set is subverted, and that the
> benefits you should gain from the sub-set are not gained.
I think the original poster is asking what method he would use
together with UML (if that were the notation chosen).
For UML you have at least RUP, ROPES, RtP Mentor and god only
knows how many more methods. At least one per tool vendor!
But I'm sorry I don't know which one is the 'de facto' standard. :-(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-03 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-02 16:51 Which OO is in ?? Paul Foster
2001-08-02 17:10 ` Ted Dennison
2001-08-02 18:02 ` Paul Foster
2001-08-03 9:27 ` Hambut
2001-08-03 12:33 ` Martin Dowie [this message]
2001-08-03 13:31 ` Ted Dennison
2001-08-03 20:28 ` Hambut
2001-08-06 13:25 ` Martin Dowie
2001-08-03 18:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2001-08-04 10:30 ` Shayne Flint
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox