Re: Overloading and / or / = / etc etc

["David C. Hoos, Sr." <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com>]

What you need to do is use regulate function notation instead of
infix operator notation -- e.g.

Packagex."=" (expression_1, expression_2)

(copy mailed to Phil Foran)

"Phil Foran" <pforan@cae.com> wrote in message
news:9ga3ed$oeb$1@dns3.cae.ca...
> Hrm, it seems that someone called Mark responded to my post, but for some
> reason i only see Jacob's response.... if anyone actually posted how to do
> it.. could they mail me the answer instead :)
>
> Thanx!
> Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@nbi.dk> wrote in message
> news:3B2884C0.175B4DC9@nbi.dk...
> > Mark:
> >
> > > I'd second that, Phil.  The fact that you think "or" can be overloaded
> (it
> > > can't, really)
> >
> > According to 4.5(2-7), 6.1(9-10) and 6.6(1), the operator "or" _can_ be
> > overloaded. The only operator for which special rules apply is "/=".
> >
> > Jacob
> > --
> > "Any, sufficiently complicated, experiment is indistinguishable from
> magic."
>
>



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----==  Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----