From: ncohen@watson.ibm.com (Norman H. Cohen)
Subject: Re: Ada Portability... NOT!
Date: 21 Nov 1994 16:19:01 GMT
Date: 1994-11-21T16:19:01+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3aqh9l$o55@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3ap9st$1mv@hydra.Helsinki.FI
In article <3ap9st$1mv@hydra.Helsinki.FI>, holsti@cs.Helsinki.FI (Niklas
Holsti) writes:
|> Apparently the
|> compiler on the former system lets a record rep spec override an
|> alignment specified for the component types, but the present compiler
|> does not let you do that.
If this is the case, the original compiler is remiss. A compiler must
reject representation clauses that it does not obey, and there is no way
to obey the given self-contradictory set of representation clauses.
--
Norman H. Cohen ncohen@watson.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1994-11-21 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1994-11-18 21:04 Ada Portability... NOT! Capt. Britt Snodgrass
1994-11-19 16:55 ` Robert Dewar
1994-11-21 2:11 ` Carlos Perez
1994-11-21 13:17 ` Robert Dewar
1994-11-21 23:56 ` Keith Thompson
1994-11-22 3:53 ` Robert Dewar
1994-11-23 12:49 ` Michael J. Meier
1994-11-24 19:21 ` R_Tim_Coslet
1994-11-20 1:33 ` Carlos Perez
1994-11-21 5:06 ` Niklas Holsti
1994-11-21 16:19 ` Norman H. Cohen [this message]
1994-11-21 14:59 ` Mitch Gart
1994-11-21 15:40 ` Michael J. Meier
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox