From: "Alex Angas" <wgd@adelaide.on.net>
Subject: Re: Instantiating a generic ADT from another ADT
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:33:34 +0930
Date: 2001-04-23T12:33:34+09:30 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ae39c1c@duster.adelaide.on.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3AE39790.6E337130@acm.org
Ah sorry, yeah Hash_Table.Hash_Table_List is private.
Any suggestions as to how best to implement this? I don't mind if I have to
change the whole thing!!
Alex.
"Jeffrey Carter" <jrcarter@acm.org> wrote in message
news:3AE39790.6E337130@acm.org...
> Without knowing the definition of Hash_Table_Entry I can't be sure this
> is the only problem, but Hash_Table.Hash_Table_List is private, while
> Hash_Table.Hash_Table_List_Package.Item_List is limited private, so the
> full definition of Hash_Table_List cannot be "new
> Hash_Table_List_Package.Item_List".
>
> --
> Jeff Carter
> "We call your door-opening request a silly thing."
> Monty Python & the Holy Grail
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-23 3:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-23 0:14 Instantiating a generic ADT from another ADT Alex Angas
2001-04-23 2:46 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-04-23 3:03 ` Alex Angas [this message]
2001-04-23 22:29 ` Des Walker
2001-04-23 23:48 ` Marc A. Criley
2001-04-24 5:26 ` Alex Angas
2001-04-24 6:31 ` Des Walker
2001-04-27 19:22 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox