From: "Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@nospam.baesystems.com>
Subject: Re: Default expression only allowed for "in" parameters - why?
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:59:04 +0100
Date: 2001-04-10T14:59:04+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ad30f69@pull.gecm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9asj9q$jfp4@cui1.lmms.lmco.com
> Yes, I was saying what you think I was saying. The possibility of using
> a default variable did not occur to me. In fact this idea still seems
> bizarre to me, although I can certainly think of cases where some out
> parameters are "don't cares" to the caller.
absolutely, just _please_ comment these occasions as such for
the poor maintenance sap how follows... :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-10 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-06 20:41 Default expression only allowed for "in" parameters - why? Smark
2001-04-06 21:30 ` Corey Ashford
2001-04-06 21:49 ` Robert A Duff
2001-04-07 4:19 ` Ben Brosgol
2001-04-09 14:42 ` Marin David Condic
2001-04-09 15:08 ` Smark
2001-04-10 13:59 ` Martin Dowie [this message]
2001-04-07 14:12 ` Charles H. Sampson
2001-04-07 18:17 ` Ben Brosgol
2001-04-09 14:07 ` Marin David Condic
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox