Re: SPC guidelines for Ada 9X?

[dweller@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (David Weller)]

In article <Cz9HzL.54r@ss3.magec.com>,
Mike J. Meiers <mjmeie@ss3.magec.com> wrote:
>Is the SPC (or any other organization) publishing an updated version of the
>much-revered "Ada Quality and Style: Guidelines for Professional Programmers"
>that will cover Ada 9X?  

Yes.

>If so, when will such a guide be released for use by
>non-SPC members?  We would like to be a bit pro-active in the updating of our
>standards for Ada 9X and would prefer to not work in a vacuum.
>
>Thanks for any help you can provide.
>

I know the SPC is aggressively trying to get a new version of the Q&S
out within a few months of publication of the Ada 9X language
standard.  In the meantime, you should use the styles covered in the
Ada 9X Reference Manual and Rationale -- in particular, the Rationale
contains many good "style" issues.

I seriously doubt you'd work in a "vacuum" though, you could always
generally apply the "old" version of the Q&S rather successfully.


-- 
Proud (and vocal) member of Team Ada! (and Team OS/2)        ||This is not your
   	      Ada -- Very Cool.  Doesn't Suck.               ||  father's Ada 
For all sorts of interesting Ada tidbits, run the command:   ||________________
"finger dweller@starbase.neosoft.com | more" (or e-mail with "finger" as subj.)
   ObNitPick: Spelling Ada as ADA is like spelling C++ as CPLUSPLUS. :-)