From: Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com>
Subject: Re: if oo programming is the roman numerals of computing why add it?
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 17:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2013-07-08T17:31:32-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a80ba7a-dbb0-4327-a840-e7c5cbc3764d@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <faba646e-91bf-4d11-b222-710ed7666854@googlegroups.com>
On Sunday, July 7, 2013 1:50:54 PM UTC-7, johannes falcone wrote:
> why?
I don't see the point of bringing this up now, since object-oriented programming got added way back in Ada XCV.
-- Adam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-09 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-07 20:50 if oo programming is the roman numerals of computing why add it? johannes falcone
2013-07-08 11:01 ` Dufr
2013-07-08 17:07 ` Pascal Obry
2013-07-09 0:19 ` johannes falcone
2013-07-09 19:14 ` Georg Bauhaus
2013-07-09 19:43 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-07-09 20:55 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-07-09 0:31 ` Adam Beneschan [this message]
2013-07-10 13:13 ` Martin
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox