Re: Is JGNAT production ready?...

["Andrzej Lewandowski" <lewandoREMOVE@attglobal.net>]

"Pascal Obry" <p.obry@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message
news:usnmwn42b.fsf@wanadoo.fr...
>
> "Andrzej Lewandowski" <lewandoREMOVE@attglobal.net> writes:
>
> > I am working on some Java application that is heavily using threads.
> > Programming multithreaded applications in Java is, ehem... sorry...
> > no fun. Therefore, I have undusted my Ada83 skills, upgraded to 95
> > and I am thinking about using JGNAT for this part of application that
> > uses threads, with the rest in plain Java.
> >
> > This is commercial application, and I have no room for mistakes.
>
> So the main mistake will be to use the puplic release meaning no support :)
>
> > Mistakes would be expensive. Therefore, the question(s): what is the
> > quality of JGNAT? Is here anybody who has experience with using
> > JGNAT for medium-size real life projects? Linking JGNAT modules
> > with Java modules? Quality of JGNAT threads?...
> >
> > Other question: is GNU JGNAT as good/bad as the commercial version
> > of JGNAT? Are they the same JGNATs?...
>
> Well JGNAT is JGNAT. The main difference is the support not the tool.
>

Well, if both JGNATs are the same, what "support" means? They will
be teachning me Ada?...

A.L.