From: "Andrzej Lewandowski" <lewandoREMOVE@attglobal.net>
Subject: Is JGNAT production ready?...
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 19:03:23 -0600
Date: 2001-01-03T19:03:23-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a53bed0_3@news3.prserv.net> (raw)
I am working on some Java application that is heavily using threads.
Programming multithreaded applications in Java is, ehem... sorry...
no fun. Therefore, I have undusted my Ada83 skills, upgraded to 95
and I am thinking about using JGNAT for this part of application that
uses threads, with the rest in plain Java.
This is commercial application, and I have no room for mistakes.
Mistakes would be expensive. Therefore, the question(s): what is the
quality of JGNAT? Is here anybody who has experience with using
JGNAT for medium-size real life projects? Linking JGNAT modules
with Java modules? Quality of JGNAT threads?...
Other question: is GNU JGNAT as good/bad as the commercial version
of JGNAT? Are they the same JGNATs?...
Andrzej Lewandowski
next reply other threads:[~2001-01-04 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-04 1:03 Andrzej Lewandowski [this message]
2001-01-04 3:08 ` Is JGNAT production ready? Rajagopalan Srinivasan
2001-01-04 18:01 ` Andrzej Lewandowski
2001-01-04 20:42 ` Rob Veenker
2001-01-06 14:33 ` Pascal Obry
2001-01-07 2:25 ` Andrzej Lewandowski
2001-01-07 4:00 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-07 10:08 ` Pascal Obry
2001-01-07 14:35 ` David Botton
2001-01-07 5:36 ` tmoran
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox