From: Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@crs4.it>
Subject: Re: Macks - adding unit constants?
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 00:38:49 +0100
Date: 2003-11-06T08:59:15+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FA98A09.5040009@crs4.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.260.1067861497.25614.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
Christoph Grein wrote:
> Why not:
>
> Dist: constant Meter := +0.000_86;
Because that converts a dimensionless number to a dimensioned number,
and you can't do that (in physics).
> Or use Dmitry Kazakov's or my method:
>
> Dist: constant SI := 0.000_86 * Meter;
> or
> Dist: constant SI := 0.86 * Milli * Meter;
This is in some ways more to my taste. Here there are no conversions of
dimensionless numbers to dimensioned numbers. But I prefer the
compile-time checking I get with Macks to the run-time checking implied
in the above examples.
Jacob
--
"[...] *transfer* a bit of salary from the person who writes
a bug to the person that finds a bug..." -- Keith Ray
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-05 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-03 11:57 Macks - adding unit constants? christoph.grein
2003-11-05 23:38 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-06 9:58 christoph.grein
2003-10-20 11:08 christoph.grein
2003-10-09 7:57 Jacob Sparre Andersen
2003-10-14 16:01 ` Stephen Leake
2003-10-17 20:23 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2003-10-20 14:48 ` Preben Randhol
2003-11-03 11:45 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2003-11-03 14:24 ` Preben Randhol
2003-10-20 19:06 ` Stephen Leake
2003-11-03 11:45 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox