comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeffrey Carter <spam@spam.com>
Subject: Re: employment with ada
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 02:28:20 GMT
Date: 2003-05-05T02:28:20+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EB5CC51.1060609@spam.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3EB5B19D.96252B96@adaworks.com

Richard Riehle wrote:
> Jeffrey Carter wrote:
> 
>>Richard Riehle wrote:
>>
>>>... It [using a subset of C] will cost them more in the long run ...
>>
>>Here we probably see the real business case. The longer and more
>>expensive the software is, the more profit the company makes, under
>>typical large defense software contracts.
> 
> I would be the last person to attribute such nefarious motives to a
> company as respectable as LMCO.   My guess is that those who
> made the decision to abandon Ada did so  with the best of intentions,
> with intellectual honesty, and with honorable expectations.   I know
> many of the LMCO software engineers and respect their business
> ethics.   This does not change the fact that I believe they came to
> a wrong conclusion regarding Ada.
> 
> Also, and very important, I believe that they will strive to do the
> very best software they can using the tools they have selected.  We
> can disagree about conclusions without casting doubts about someone's
> honor.

I have seen too many large defense contracts in the US, with a number of 
large defense contractors, in which everything is done to make the SW as 
expensive as possible, and efforts to make the SW less expensive are not 
allowed to succeed, to attribute it to anything other than a well 
developed ability by these companies to find the saddle point between 
maximizing profit and not antagonizing the customer too much.

These companies ARE in business to make money, and the quality of the 
product is only of importance as it affects their profit. It can only be 
because the customer does not know any better that this conduct is 
allowed to continue.

It may be that those who reached the decision to use C had the best of 
intentions and believe they made the correct choice, but given the level 
of FUD in their presentation I have my doubts (NO universities in the US 
teaching Ada?). I suspect that if the study had been seen going in the 
direction of recommending the use of Ada pressure would have been 
brought to reach a different conclusion.

I'm sorry that I cannot be as optimistic about this as you, but 
experience has made me cynical.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail




  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-05  2:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-02  0:36 employment with ada tom
2003-05-02  0:41 ` Ed Falis
2003-05-02  8:51 ` John McCabe
2003-05-02 12:08 ` Marin David Condic
2003-05-02 20:54 ` Bill Sheehan
2003-05-03  3:23   ` R. Srinivasan
2003-05-03  4:13     ` John R. Strohm
2003-05-03  5:03       ` anisimkov
2003-05-03  7:07         ` Anders Wirzenius
2003-05-03  7:46           ` AG
2003-05-05  5:38             ` Anders Wirzenius
2003-05-03 14:44         ` Marin David Condic
2003-05-04 15:32       ` Mark Lorenzen
2003-05-05 11:47         ` Marin David Condic
2003-05-03 14:37     ` Marin David Condic
2003-05-03 16:03 ` DPH
2003-05-03 16:22   ` Chad R. Meiners
2003-05-03 17:18     ` DPH
2003-05-03 20:30       ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-05-03 19:17   ` Richard Riehle
2003-05-03 20:35     ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-05-04 11:01       ` Simon Wright
2003-05-05  0:34       ` Richard Riehle
2003-05-05  2:28         ` Jeffrey Carter [this message]
2003-05-05  3:33           ` Wesley Groleau
2003-05-05 12:30           ` Robert A Duff
2003-05-04 13:14     ` DPH
2003-05-05  1:20       ` Richard Riehle
2003-05-07 12:20         ` Marin David Condic
2003-05-08 18:20           ` tmoran
2003-05-09 11:45             ` Marin David Condic
2003-05-09 13:11             ` Hyman Rosen
2003-05-09 17:13               ` Larry Kilgallen
2003-05-05  3:28       ` Wesley Groleau
2003-05-05 10:45         ` DPH
2003-05-05 12:47           ` Ed Falis
2003-05-05 20:19             ` DPH
2003-05-05 20:28               ` Ed Falis
2003-05-06 11:30                 ` Marin David Condic
2003-05-07 13:22                   ` Stephen Leake
2003-05-08 12:21                     ` Marin David Condic
2003-05-05 17:12       ` Simon Wright
2003-05-04 13:20     ` Marin David Condic
2003-05-05 17:19       ` Simon Wright
2003-05-06 12:07         ` Marin David Condic
2003-05-04 18:14     ` Hyman Rosen
2003-05-05  1:24       ` Richard Riehle
2003-05-05  1:27       ` Richard Riehle
2003-05-10 20:29       ` Chad R. Meiners
2003-05-11  3:32         ` Hyman Rosen
2003-05-11  4:25           ` Chad R. Meiners
2003-05-11 16:43             ` Hyman Rosen
2003-05-11 23:04               ` Chad R. Meiners
2003-05-11 15:29           ` Robert A Duff
2003-05-11 17:14             ` Hyman Rosen
2003-05-11 19:24           ` Rod Chapman
2003-05-11 20:03             ` Hyman Rosen
2003-05-12  7:20               ` Rod Chapman
2003-05-04  0:25   ` John R. Strohm
2003-05-04  4:09     ` DPH
2003-05-04 19:37       ` P S Norby
2003-05-04  4:55   ` Steve
2003-05-04 12:55     ` DPH
2003-05-05  6:27     ` Anders Wirzenius
2003-05-04 12:57   ` Marin David Condic
2003-05-04 16:45     ` tmoran
2003-05-04 13:45   ` Alex Gibson
2003-05-05  4:07   ` William J. Thomsa
2003-05-05 18:41   ` P S Norby
2003-05-05 20:26     ` DPH
2003-05-05 23:06       ` William J. Thomsa
2003-05-05 23:20         ` DPH
2003-05-06  9:24       ` Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
2003-05-07  1:25         ` Wesley Groleau
2003-05-07 13:23           ` Stephen Leake
2003-05-07 16:36             ` Wesley Groleau
2003-05-06  9:32       ` Preben Randhol
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-04  1:32 Alexandre E. Kopilovitch
2003-05-06 16:19 ` L. Siever
2003-05-07 13:35   ` Stephen Leake
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox