From: "John R. Strohm" <strohm@airmail.net>
Subject: Re: Ada 95 for an ARM-based bare board?
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 02:12:06 -0500
Date: 2002-08-26T02:12:06-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EB0B6E79C9D6EFC.D3BCBB3CBA74EE5E.BEE240D7DC6DB7D0@lp.airnews.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5ee5b646.0208211132.6c283ef0@posting.google.com
Robert, where would I find a writeup on what is involved in retargeting
GNAT?
Is it just a matter of doing a GCC target (i.e., writing the machine
description files and the necessary gcc runtime support)?
Are there GNAT runtime routines that must be rebuilt? What about executive
support?
"Robert Dewar" <dewar@gnat.com> wrote in message
news:5ee5b646.0208211132.6c283ef0@posting.google.com...
> Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen <oleh@vlinux.voxelvision.no> wrote in message
news:<7vlm70cqcz.fsf@vlinux.voxelvision.no>...
> > > And preferably pay up front for the develoment of the compiler.... OK
> > > strategy if you sell few expensive development systems, probably not a
> > > good strategy to penetrate the mass market.
>
> Not necessarily, ACT has developed many ports of GNAT at our expense, but
> only when we know there is a real market out there (well a couple of times
> we have skipped that step and got burned).
>
> Indeed we are not trying to "penetrate the mass market". That's not our
> business area. Our expertise is in providing high level support from high
> level competent engineers. We don't see that as scaling to a mass market.
>
> The world seems full of people who are happy to spend lots
> of energy in trying to get Ada Core to move in that direction, but sadly
> none of these people seem willing to spend their own energy persuing a
> market that they are sure we are missing!
>
> Robert Dewar
> Ada Core Techonologies
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-26 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 115+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-16 8:48 Ada 95 for an ARM-based bare board? Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-08-16 9:14 ` Steffen Huber
2002-08-16 11:22 ` Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-08-17 15:55 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-19 21:29 ` Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-08-20 0:13 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-20 21:21 ` Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-08-20 12:07 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-08-21 22:41 ` Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-08-21 13:05 ` Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
2002-08-21 13:07 ` Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
2002-08-21 14:42 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-08-21 19:32 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-22 5:43 ` Richard Riehle
2002-08-22 6:30 ` tmoran
2002-08-22 17:30 ` Richard Riehle
2002-08-23 2:01 ` Robert C. Leif
2002-08-23 4:00 ` Richard Riehle
2002-08-23 20:36 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-24 5:24 ` Robert C. Leif
2002-08-24 20:00 ` Excessive quoting and Outlook (was: Ada 95 for an ARM-based bare board?) Robert Dewar
2002-08-24 22:30 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-08-24 21:57 ` mailers, quoting text etc. (was " Robert Dewar
2002-08-25 3:29 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-08-27 18:12 ` Florian Weimer
2002-08-31 14:02 ` chris.danx
2002-08-31 13:58 ` chris.danx
2002-08-25 6:20 ` Ada 95 for an ARM-based bare board? tmoran
2002-08-26 1:56 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-26 4:42 ` tmoran
2002-08-30 19:21 ` data on cla messages, was " tmoran
2002-08-31 12:21 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-31 16:21 ` tmoran
2002-08-31 22:02 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-23 3:14 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-26 19:31 ` Florian Weimer
2002-08-22 22:49 ` tmoran
2002-08-23 14:52 ` Software Economics was " Robert C. Leif
2002-08-23 16:26 ` OT: " Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2002-08-23 18:19 ` Preben Randhol
2002-08-24 3:33 ` Weston T. Pan
2002-08-24 5:11 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-08-24 13:16 ` Bill Tate
2002-08-26 9:47 ` Georg Bauhaus
2002-08-26 12:16 ` Preben Randhol
2002-08-26 14:25 ` Marin D. Condic
2002-08-27 10:43 ` Preben Randhol
2002-08-27 19:10 ` Bill Tate
2002-08-27 22:23 ` Bill
2002-08-27 12:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-08-27 13:04 ` Bill Tate
2002-08-24 0:11 ` Software Economics Robert C. Leif
2002-08-24 13:01 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-23 17:55 ` Software Economics was RE: Ada 95 for an ARM-based bare board? Preben Randhol
2002-08-23 18:03 ` Darren New
2002-08-23 18:39 ` Preben Randhol
2002-08-23 19:15 ` Darren New
2002-08-26 14:14 ` Ted Dennison
2002-08-26 17:14 ` Darren New
2002-08-26 22:47 ` Ted Dennison
2002-08-26 17:31 ` Robert A Duff
2002-08-26 22:49 ` Ted Dennison
2002-08-24 1:58 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-27 18:43 ` Florian Weimer
2002-08-27 18:52 ` tmoran
2002-08-29 13:36 ` Preben Randhol
2002-08-24 2:05 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-24 7:28 ` tmoran
2002-08-24 21:53 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-26 13:40 ` Ted Dennison
2002-08-22 23:11 ` Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-08-22 6:50 ` Juha Valimaki
2002-08-22 13:49 ` Marin D. Condic
2002-08-23 9:29 ` Juha Valimaki
2002-08-24 2:19 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-26 21:52 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-08-27 5:57 ` Juha Valimaki
2002-08-27 19:27 ` Michael Bode
2002-08-28 1:56 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-28 12:59 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-08-28 22:32 ` Georg Bauhaus
2002-08-24 2:24 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-24 20:12 ` Michael Bode
2002-08-24 23:05 ` Darren New
2002-08-25 15:53 ` SteveD
2002-08-25 16:48 ` Michael Bode
2002-08-26 7:12 ` John R. Strohm [this message]
2002-08-21 19:30 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-08-22 8:19 ` Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
2002-08-22 19:44 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-08-29 16:03 ` Tucker Taft
2002-08-29 21:36 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-08-31 1:58 ` Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-08-30 14:19 ` Robert A Duff
2002-08-30 17:14 ` Richard Riehle
2002-09-02 20:50 ` Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-08-20 15:00 ` Darren New
2002-08-20 19:52 ` Florian Weimer
2002-08-20 20:50 ` Darren New
2002-08-20 18:29 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-21 22:41 ` Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-08-21 19:34 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-22 22:25 ` Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-08-21 19:40 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-22 0:08 ` BSCrawford
2002-08-22 1:19 ` Larry Hazel
2002-08-22 1:45 ` SteveD
2002-08-22 3:23 ` tmoran
2002-08-22 10:28 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-21 19:44 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-22 22:50 ` Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-08-20 18:32 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-19 17:16 ` Richard Riehle
2002-08-20 20:40 ` Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-08-20 15:45 ` Richard Riehle
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox