From: Richard Riehle <richard@adaworks.com>
Subject: Re: 64 bit addressing and OOP
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 14:08:16 -0800
Date: 2003-02-23T21:57:57+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E594650.E09A986D@adaworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: b3bc18$1jh31e$1@ID-139894.news.dfncis.de
Mark Thornton wrote:
> Err, but Unicode already requires (I think) 21 bits which is the point of
> this thread.
Thanks, Mark.
I am including this reply in comp.lang.ada
So, will the next Ada standard include support for a 21 bit Unicode,
or am I missing something and it already does?
Richard Riehle
next parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-23 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <b3601g$1j4sk7$1@ID-139894.news.dfncis.de>
[not found] ` <memo.20030222112846.64077A@brangdon.madasafish.com>
[not found] ` <b37off$1j0hm1$1@ID-139894.news.dfncis.de>
[not found] ` <3E593457.CA43516E@adaworks.com>
[not found] ` <b3bc18$1jh31e$1@ID-139894.news.dfncis.de>
2003-02-23 22:08 ` Richard Riehle [this message]
2003-02-24 21:23 ` 64 bit addressing and OOP Randy Brukardt
2003-02-26 22:53 ` Kent Paul Dolan
2003-02-27 0:33 ` Hyman Rosen
2003-02-27 6:56 ` Ada and 32 bit Unicode character sets (still?) " Kent Paul Dolan
2003-03-03 18:51 ` Robert I. Eachus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox