* Number of Job Listings by Programming Language (January 3, 2003)
@ 2003-01-05 14:32 Mark Lorenzen
2003-01-08 0:45 ` Richard Riehle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Lorenzen @ 2003-01-05 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
Interesting and actually not as bad as I feared:
http://www.bitbreather.com/programming_languages.html
- Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Number of Job Listings by Programming Language (January 3, 2003)
2003-01-05 14:32 Number of Job Listings by Programming Language (January 3, 2003) Mark Lorenzen
@ 2003-01-08 0:45 ` Richard Riehle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Richard Riehle @ 2003-01-08 0:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
Mark Lorenzen wrote:
> Interesting and actually not as bad as I feared:
>
> http://www.bitbreather.com/programming_languages.html
>
> - Mark
With CAML, Haskell, and Smalltalk so far down the list, and
Eiffel completely absent, one can see clearly that the more
powerful, more reliable, and more effective languages are
obscured by those that are most unreliable, most likely to
produce buggy code, and least likely to be useful for anything
safety-critical.
The ordering of the list demonstrates the sad state of affairs
in our industry. We really need to educate software engineering
managers about what constitutes good software development
tools. Of course, if they were even trying to engineer software,
the list would look much different.
Richard Riehle
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-08 0:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-05 14:32 Number of Job Listings by Programming Language (January 3, 2003) Mark Lorenzen
2003-01-08 0:45 ` Richard Riehle
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox