From: Vincent Marciante <INALID_EXCEPT_FOR_marciant@earthlink.net>
Subject: "private with" proposal
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 18:45:37 GMT
Date: 2002-11-28T18:45:37+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DE66447.2D6@earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3DE5F0BB.E7D21384@brighton.ac.uk
"with private" is a proposed addition to Ada; see
http://www.ada-auth.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/AIs/AI-00262.TXT?rev=1.13
I do not understand why the extra syntax (adding "private" to
the context clause) is necessary. Can't the rules be simply
be changed as outlined in the proposal? If compilers at this
time already do enough to recognize withing a private unit
in a public spec couldn't they be made to allow usage of withed
private units only in the private part (and body)?
--
Vinny
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-28 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-09 6:39 Style: always declare subrountines? Victor Porton
2002-11-09 11:09 ` sk
2002-11-09 12:34 ` Victor Porton
2002-11-09 14:34 ` Jim Rogers
2002-11-09 14:53 ` sk
2002-11-09 15:36 ` Robert A Duff
2002-11-09 16:16 ` Frank J. Lhota
2002-11-09 16:28 ` chris.danx
2002-11-09 18:36 ` Simon Wright
2002-11-12 17:31 ` Stephen Leake
2002-11-18 1:52 ` ;Re: " Richard Riehle
2002-11-28 10:32 ` John English
2002-11-28 12:52 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2002-12-03 11:15 ` John English
2002-12-03 12:22 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2002-12-03 13:11 ` John English
2002-12-03 14:31 ` Robert A Duff
2002-12-03 14:41 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2002-11-28 17:49 ` Vincent Marciante
2002-12-03 11:09 ` John English
2002-11-28 18:45 ` Vincent Marciante [this message]
2002-11-28 20:12 ` "private with" proposal David C. Hoos, Sr.
2002-11-29 4:28 ` Vincent Marciante
2002-12-01 1:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-12-02 18:20 ` Stephen Leake
2002-12-03 5:37 ` Vincent Marciante
2002-12-03 19:24 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-12-04 3:52 ` Vincent Marciante
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox