From: "Marc A. Criley" <mcq95@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Charles: missing vector iterators
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:10:24 GMT
Date: 2002-11-14T12:10:24+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DD3846B.7EADD25C@earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3dd29387$0$303$bed64819@news.gradwell.net
Victor Porton wrote:
>
> In enclosed loops:
>
> for i in ... loop
> for j in ... loop
> ...
> end loop;
> end loop;
>
> personally I often mess I and J. Probability to mess iterators is
> lesser than to mess natural number indexes because iterators are more
> type-safe.
You can't mess with I and J inside a loop like this. They're
effectively constants as far as the enclosed statements are concerned.
Marc A. Criley
Quadrus Corporation
www.quadruscorp.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-14 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-13 17:15 Charles: missing vector iterators Victor Porton
2002-11-14 9:22 ` Preben Randhol
2002-11-14 12:10 ` Marc A. Criley [this message]
2002-11-14 15:30 ` Preben Randhol
2002-11-14 16:04 ` Matthew Heaney
2002-11-15 7:10 ` Victor Porton
2002-11-15 9:36 ` Preben Randhol
2002-11-15 9:37 ` Preben Randhol
2002-11-15 7:27 ` Victor Porton
2002-11-16 0:10 ` Matthew Heaney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox