From: cjsonnack@mmm.com (Programmer Dude)
Subject: Re: Aspect-Oriented Programming
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:13:15 -0500
Date: 2002-10-15T11:13:15-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DAC3E9B.5C122B1E@mmm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3DA5EC5A.1060506@worldnet.att.net
Jim Rogers wrote:
>>> private package body Ice_Cream.Debug.After is
>>> [...]
>>> end Ice_Cream.Debug.After;
>>>
>>
>> Should the keyword "body" not be there above? (I have, so far, only
>> a smattering, passing knowledge of Ada, so I'm probably wrong.)
>>
>> In any event, I found it a very educational example; thanks!
>
> These are private package specifications. As such they must not
> have the word "body" as part of their declaration line. The private
> bodies would have the word "body".
Cool! I just debugged my first Ada program!! ;-)
--
|_ CJSonnack <Chris@Sonnack.com> _____________| How's my programming? |
|_ http://www.Sonnack.com/ ___________________| Call: 1-800-DEV-NULL |
|_____________________________________________|_______________________|
Opinions expressed herein are my own and may not represent those of my employer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-15 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-29 19:46 Aspect-Oriented Programming Richard Riehle
2002-09-29 22:56 ` Nick Roberts
2002-09-29 23:27 ` Pat Rogers
2002-10-01 23:45 ` Richard Riehle
2002-10-03 0:11 ` Nick Roberts
2002-10-10 20:38 ` Programmer Dude
2002-10-10 21:09 ` Jim Rogers
2002-10-15 16:13 ` Programmer Dude [this message]
2002-09-30 6:02 ` Caffeine Junky
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox