Re: Aspect-Oriented Programming

[Jim Rogers <jimmaureenrogers@worldnet.att.net>]

Programmer Dude wrote:

> Nick Roberts wrote:
> 
> I was very interested in your example of AOP.  I puzzled over this:
> 
> 
>>Now, suppose we wished to divide this into the aspects: Debug.Before;
>>Main; Debug.After. The refactoring would generate the following
>>compilation units:
>>
>>   private package Ice_Cream.Debug is end;
>>   private package Ice_Cream.Debug.Before is
>>       [...]
>>   end Ice_Cream.Debug.Before;
>>
>>   private package Ice_Cream.Main is
>>       [...]
>>   end Ice_Cream.Main;
>>
>>   private package body Ice_Cream.Debug.After is
>>       [...]
>>   end Ice_Cream.Debug.After;
>>
> 
> Should the keyword "body" not be there above?  (I have, so far, only
> a smattering, passing knowledge of Ada, so I'm probably wrong.)
> 
> In any event, I found it a very educational example; thanks!
>


These are private package specifications. As such they must not
have the word "body" as part of their declaration line. The private
bodies would have the word "body".

Jim Rogers