From: Mark Biggar <mark.a.biggar@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: array of operations
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 14:32:10 GMT
Date: 2002-09-12T14:32:10+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D80A553.5030208@attbi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: alpi26$rr6$1@news.iucc.ac.il
Ehud Lamm wrote:
>>Not true. Since it is always OK to take 'Unchecked_Access of a parameter
>>of a tagged type in Ada 95, you generally do not need to explicitly use
>>"aliased". Claw uses this extensively to provide an interface which is
>>mostly without access types, yet internally everything is linked
>>together. (Claw uses finalization to prevent dangling pointers in this
>>case).
> Sure. You can rephrase what I wrote, "You usually need to decalre aliased
> objects, or use 'Unchecked_Access." :-)
um, tagged objects are by definition aliased, see ARM 3.10(9). No need
for an explisit declaration.
--
Mark Biggar
mark.a.biggar@attbi.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-12 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-10 13:45 array of operations marco
2002-09-10 15:28 ` Mark Biggar
2002-09-10 17:09 ` Ehud Lamm
2002-09-11 7:43 ` Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
2002-09-11 10:10 ` Ehud Lamm
2002-09-11 23:43 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-09-12 9:01 ` Ehud Lamm
2002-09-12 14:32 ` Mark Biggar [this message]
2002-09-12 16:15 ` John McCabe
2002-09-12 16:37 ` David C. Hoos
2002-09-12 17:45 ` John McCabe
2002-09-11 2:17 ` Ted Dennison
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox