From: Darren New <dnew@san.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Java falling short of mobile promise?
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 20:41:24 GMT
Date: 2002-09-03T20:41:24+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D751ED9.10E42DFD@san.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: $8jm$e8745Ua@eisner.encompasserve.org
Larry Kilgallen wrote:
> I don't think Wes implied that Ada would be better.
OK. My assumption was that it was a gloat, considering it was posted to
comp.lang.ada. :-)
> My understanding of the reasoning for the post was:
> Be careful of what you deliver, someone might demand delivery.
Something like that, too. :-)
--
Darren New
San Diego, CA, USA (PST). Cryptokeys on demand.
** http://images.fbrtech.com/dnew/ **
Try our EbolaBurgers...
So tender they melt in your mouth.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-03 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-03 17:54 Java falling short of mobile promise? Wes Groleau
2002-09-03 18:11 ` Darren New
2002-09-03 19:35 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-09-03 20:41 ` Darren New [this message]
2002-09-04 5:52 ` Robert C. Leif
2002-09-04 7:24 ` Florian Weimer
2002-09-04 17:30 ` Darren New
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox