From: Richard Riehle <richard@adaworks.com>
Subject: Re: Decimal Floating types
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:15:15 -0700
Date: 2002-08-22T18:10:29+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D652A33.B5FE93B9@adaworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5ee5b646.0208191626.288b143d@posting.google.com
Robert Dewar wrote:
> "Warren W. Gay VE3WWG" <ve3wwg@cogeco.ca> wrote in message news:<3D5E5E14.5010405@cogeco.ca>...
>
> > > ADD FIELD-1 TO FIELD-2 GIVING FIELD-3.
>
> ouch! I have been away from COBOL for too long, this
> should of course be
>
> ADD FIELD-1 FIELD-2 GIVING FIELD-3
Actually, the TO is not illegal, according to the syntax chart in my
closest-to-hand COBOL book. It is simply optional when using the
GIVING option. .
ADD {identifier-1/literal-1} ... TO {identifier-2/literal-2}
GIVING {identifier-3} ...
END-ADD
The ADD, GIVING and END-ADD are underscored. The TO is not.
Robert is correct that COBOL programmers are quite able to do their
job without a floating point type. However, the USAGE IS clause
offers some data formats beyond those found in Ada and of particular
value to the day-to-day COBOL practitioner.
Richard Riehle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-22 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-24 5:33 Dispatching and generics - language lawyer question Grein, Christoph
2002-07-24 22:55 ` Robert A Duff
2002-07-25 15:46 ` Ben Brosgol
2002-07-29 20:38 ` Robert A Duff
2002-07-31 22:52 ` Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-07-31 20:18 ` Robert A Duff
2002-08-02 1:15 ` Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-08-01 16:30 ` Hyman Rosen
2002-08-02 23:42 ` Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-08-02 15:49 ` Hyman Rosen
2002-08-02 17:48 ` Stephen Leake
2002-08-10 3:03 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2002-08-05 11:15 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2002-08-12 12:44 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-13 2:00 ` Information Systems Annex was " Robert C. Leif
2002-08-13 8:17 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-13 23:53 ` Information Systems Annex Robert C. Leif
2002-08-13 17:37 ` Information Systems Annex was RE: Dispatching and generics - language lawyer question Keith Thompson
2002-08-13 23:53 ` Robert C. Leif
2002-08-14 8:52 ` Keith Thompson
2002-08-14 21:53 ` Robert C. Leif
2002-08-15 9:31 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-15 21:54 ` Decimal Floating point was " Robert C. Leif
2002-08-16 6:26 ` Keith Thompson
2002-08-16 16:26 ` Robert C. Leif
2002-08-16 18:17 ` Keith Thompson
2002-08-16 15:26 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-16 15:29 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-15 9:26 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-15 16:17 ` Darren New
2002-08-15 17:25 ` David C. Hoos
2002-08-15 17:31 ` Darren New
2002-08-15 19:59 ` Frank J. Lhota
2002-08-15 17:39 ` tmoran
2002-08-15 19:18 ` Information Systems Annex was RE: Dispatching and generics - Larry Kilgallen
2002-08-15 18:41 ` Hyman Rosen
2002-08-16 15:49 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-17 6:31 ` Simon Wright
2002-08-17 14:17 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-15 21:54 ` Decimal Floating types was RE: Information Systems Annex was RE: Dispatching and generics - language lawyer question Robert C. Leif
2002-08-16 15:21 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-16 16:15 ` Decimal Floating types Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2002-08-17 10:52 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-17 14:30 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2002-08-20 0:26 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-20 2:35 ` SteveD
2002-08-22 18:15 ` Richard Riehle [this message]
2002-08-23 3:23 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-16 15:47 ` Information Systems Annex (usefulness of Decimal Floats) Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2002-08-17 10:54 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-17 14:06 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2002-08-17 10:56 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-17 14:12 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2002-08-17 19:04 ` Robert C. Leif
2002-08-20 0:25 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-16 15:38 ` Information Systems Annex was RE: Dispatching and generics - language lawyer question Robert Dewar
2002-08-13 22:50 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-08-14 0:02 ` Robert A Duff
2002-07-25 0:40 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox