From: Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@nbi.dk>
Subject: Re: best way to handle long strings!?
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 11:28:00 +0200
Date: 2002-08-19T11:28:00+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D60BA20.7010007@nbi.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: cj289.6404$hk3.1153145@news.xtra.co.nz
AG wrote:
> Currently, yes. But if someone was to write
> an Ada compiler for a paper-tape based machine
> with no concept of a line break even? Would that
> compiler stop being Ada?
Yes, since comments are defined to be terminated by line breaks.
> Also, the 2.2(2) goes on to add (after your quote) that
> "representation for an end of line is implementation
> defined". I'm not too sure about that one, but does it mean
> that an implementation is allowed to *not* represent
> the EOL at all, provided it has no problem compiling
> the result?
It is free to choose the _representation_ of the source
code, but it has to support all the characters in ISO 8859-1.
Jacob
--
"Hungh. You see! More bear. Yellow snow is always dead
give-away."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-19 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <c923f575.0208150903.5ac6b098@posting.google.com>
2002-08-16 14:34 ` best way to handle long strings!? Jacob Sparre Andersen
2002-08-18 4:30 ` AG
2002-08-19 0:53 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-19 8:52 ` AG
2002-08-19 9:28 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen [this message]
2002-08-21 8:17 ` AG
2002-08-17 10:57 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-24 13:32 ` Bruce or Tracy Jacobs
2002-08-24 21:48 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-25 17:49 ` Vincent Marciante
2002-08-26 16:36 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox