From: Larry Elmore <ljelmore@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: What's it's name again?
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 23:32:14 GMT
Date: 2002-07-29T23:32:14+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D44AC3D.80607@attbi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: c%j19.1578$Qi2.19423@newsfep3-gui.server.ntli.net
chris.danx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What do you call private types whose declaration is found in the
> specification but whose definition is found in the body? I remember
> reading/hearing that they have a name (or term) associated with them,
> but can't remember what it is.
>
> Are there any complications with moving type definitions to the body?
> (e.g. with controlled types?). Cohens' book is at the ready, just need
> their name or a pointer!
I think what you want is covered in 11.2 of Cohen (p. 465 in my copy),
and they're called incomplete type declarations.
I'm re-learning Ada and just happened to cover that section last night. :)
--Larry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-29 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-29 23:13 What's it's name again? chris.danx
2002-07-29 23:32 ` Larry Elmore [this message]
2002-07-30 0:08 ` chris.danx
2002-07-29 23:47 ` Robert A Duff
2002-07-30 0:50 ` chris.danx
2002-07-30 8:21 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2002-07-30 18:53 ` Robert A Duff
2002-08-01 0:11 ` Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-07-31 20:38 ` Robert A Duff
2002-08-02 2:21 ` Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-07-30 18:55 ` Richard Riehle
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox