From: Wes Groleau <wesgroleau@despammed.com>
Subject: Re: Look what I caught! was re:Ada paper critic
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 09:29:03 -0500
Date: 2002-06-19T09:29:03-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D10952F.17A62CCF@despammed.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3d0fb5eb_3@news.bluewin.ch
> > A C array does not contain
> >"one element more" on either side. The standard allows setting
> >a pointer to the next element after the end of an array, but
> >such a pointer can not be dereferenced.
The standard does? But most compilers ignore this, right?
Or is the some other explanation why it's so @#$%@#$% easy
to get a segmentation fault in C ?
Or did I completely misunderstand the statement?
--
Wes Groleau
http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-19 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-17 17:35 Look what I caught! was re:Ada paper critic Alderson, Paul A.
2002-06-17 18:31 ` Darren New
2002-06-17 21:40 ` Vinzent Hoefler
2002-06-17 23:14 ` Darren New
2002-06-18 14:49 ` Hyman Rosen
2002-06-18 22:36 ` Vinzent Hoefler
2002-06-18 13:28 ` Marin David Condic
2002-06-24 19:17 ` Vinzent Hoefler
2002-06-18 19:16 ` Kevin Cline
2002-06-18 22:36 ` Vinzent Hoefler
2002-06-19 14:29 ` Wes Groleau [this message]
2002-06-19 16:59 ` Darren New
2002-06-19 17:48 ` Wes Groleau
2002-06-19 17:56 ` Darren New
2002-06-19 17:11 ` Frank J. Lhota
2002-06-19 19:31 ` Robert A Duff
2002-06-19 20:02 ` Hyman Rosen
2002-09-24 15:23 ` Matthew Heaney
2002-06-19 19:37 ` Robert A Duff
2002-06-19 13:52 ` Ted Dennison
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox