From: Wes Groleau <wesgroleau@despammed.com>
Subject: C.A.R. Hoare on liability
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 11:09:30 -0500
Date: 2002-06-17T11:09:30-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D0E09BA.A492AA3D@despammed.com> (raw)
Tying together two recent threads,
a quote from "The Emperor's Old Clothes":
... we asked our customers whether they wished us
to provide an option to switch off these checks
in the interests of efficiency on production runs.
Unanimously, they urged us not to--they already knew
how frequently subscript errors occur on production
runs where failure to detect them would be disastrous.
I note with fear and horror that even in 1980, language
designers and users ahve not learned this lesson.
In any respectable branch of engineering, failure
to observe such elementary precautions would have
long been against the law.
--
Wes Groleau
http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau
next reply other threads:[~2002-06-17 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-17 16:09 Wes Groleau [this message]
2002-06-19 16:14 ` C.A.R. Hoare on liability Mike Silva
2002-06-19 16:57 ` Darren New
2002-06-19 18:03 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-06-19 17:54 ` Wes Groleau
2002-06-20 13:05 ` Marin David Condic
2002-06-21 14:31 ` Wes Groleau
2002-06-21 16:47 ` Marin David Condic
2002-06-21 11:55 ` Robert Dewar
2002-06-21 20:45 ` Robert I. Eachus
2002-06-22 13:14 ` Robert Dewar
2002-06-22 13:36 ` Jack Flynn
2002-06-22 16:47 ` Mark Biggar
2002-06-23 15:47 ` Robert I. Eachus
2002-06-22 2:55 ` SteveD
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox