From: David Rasmussen <pinkfloydhomer@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Ada -> C or C++ translator
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 14:59:04 +0200
Date: 2002-06-17T14:59:04+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D0DDD18.7090501@yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3d0dda3d$1@pull.gecm.com
Martin Dowie wrote:
>
> Why do you suspect that an Ada compiler won't give you decent performance?
> The performance of today's Ada95 compilers seem pretty much on a par with
> the C/C++ compilers I'm using. There is an argument that they should be
> able to produce more efficient code too but other than the 'famous' Tartan
> compiler paper, I have yet to see much evidence of this.
>
> Didn't Averstar/Intermetric's Ada compiler use 'C' as an intermediate
> representation?
>
There might exist good Ada compilers. But I use free tools. I use gcc
for Ada, and while it has a good x86 backend, there exist other free
compilers such as the free Intel C++ and others that produce even better
code. Such a translator would give more choice to the programmer.
/David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-17 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-17 12:26 Ada -> C or C++ translator David Rasmussen
2002-06-17 12:51 ` Martin Dowie
2002-06-17 12:59 ` David Rasmussen [this message]
2002-06-17 14:21 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-06-17 14:19 ` David Rasmussen
2002-06-28 18:40 ` pontius
2002-06-29 1:47 ` tmoran
2002-07-01 14:30 ` pontius
2002-07-03 15:16 ` Robert I. Eachus
2002-07-13 22:55 ` David Thompson
2002-06-18 23:41 ` Robert A Duff
2002-06-19 0:21 ` exceptions and C functions (was Re: Ada -> C or C++ translator) Dale Stanbrough
2002-06-19 1:44 ` Robert A Duff
2002-06-19 14:32 ` Wes Groleau
2002-06-19 17:33 ` Robert A Duff
2002-06-19 17:58 ` Wes Groleau
2002-06-19 19:17 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox