From: Mark Johnson <mark_h_johnson@raytheon.com>
Subject: Re: Why is memory footprint smaller when compiled static?
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 08:42:03 -0500
Date: 2002-06-05T08:42:03-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CFE152B.DB2702B2@raytheon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrnafs1dn.aa1.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no
Preben Randhol wrote:
> I was only curious why the memory usage seems to drop 1 Mb after
> compiling the program as static rather than shared. I don't care so much
> how much memory my program takes, I just wanted to learn something about
> this.
>
Did you review the link map as I suggested in a previous reply?
news:3CFCE726.38B15035%40raytheon.com
That should give you the information you need on what is included /
excluded from the static and dynamically linked application.
--Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-05 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-05 11:37 Why is memory footprint smaller when compiled static? Grein, Christoph
2002-06-05 12:36 ` Preben Randhol
2002-06-05 13:42 ` Mark Johnson [this message]
2002-06-06 0:02 ` Steven Deller
2002-06-06 10:35 ` Preben Randhol
2002-06-06 14:26 ` Gautier
2002-06-06 15:08 ` Jean-Marc Bourguet
2002-06-06 15:24 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2002-06-06 19:35 ` Jeffrey Carter
2002-06-10 23:51 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-06-11 0:53 ` Robert A Duff
2002-06-11 16:45 ` Wes Groleau
2002-06-11 17:08 ` Preben Randhol
2002-06-11 19:12 ` Wes Groleau
2002-06-11 21:38 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-06-11 21:32 ` Randy Brukardt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-04 15:14 Preben Randhol
2002-06-04 16:13 ` Mark Johnson
2002-06-04 21:01 ` Florian Weimer
2002-06-04 21:02 ` Florian Weimer
2002-06-04 21:03 ` Florian Weimer
2002-06-05 11:10 ` Preben Randhol
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox