* High Dependability Computing Consortium
@ 2002-05-16 6:14 Russ
2002-05-17 14:59 ` Jim Rogers
2002-05-17 17:20 ` Ted Dennison
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Russ @ 2002-05-16 6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
I am curious to know what Ada folks think of the High Dependability
Computing Consortium
http://www.hdcc.cs.cmu.edu/index.html
Are they on the right track, and are they giving adequate attention to
Ada? Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: High Dependability Computing Consortium
2002-05-16 6:14 High Dependability Computing Consortium Russ
@ 2002-05-17 14:59 ` Jim Rogers
2002-05-17 17:20 ` Ted Dennison
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jim Rogers @ 2002-05-17 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
Russ wrote:
> I am curious to know what Ada folks think of the High Dependability
> Computing Consortium
>
> http://www.hdcc.cs.cmu.edu/index.html
>
> Are they on the right track, and are they giving adequate attention to
> Ada? Thanks.
>
Interesting work. As usual in such meetings, they are spending a
significant amount of time re-inventing the wheel. They also do
not seem to be listening to each other very well.
Each document displayed a tight focus by its author(s) with
no evidence of interaction. Boehm, as usual, displayed a lot of
graphical data with little connection to details. Other groups
seem to want to jump into the details with little formal analysis.
This meeting appears to be a very early step in defining various
positions and beliefs. This primarily political process will
continue until some subgroup becomes dominant. At that point a
serious technical proposal may emerge.
Jim Rogers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: High Dependability Computing Consortium
2002-05-16 6:14 High Dependability Computing Consortium Russ
2002-05-17 14:59 ` Jim Rogers
@ 2002-05-17 17:20 ` Ted Dennison
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ted Dennison @ 2002-05-17 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
18k11tm001@sneakemail.com (Russ) wrote in message news:<bebbba07.0205152214.fc253e7@posting.google.com>...
> I am curious to know what Ada folks think of the High Dependability
> Computing Consortium
>
> http://www.hdcc.cs.cmu.edu/index.html
>
> Are they on the right track, and are they giving adequate attention to
> Ada? Thanks.
I'd be more interested in what it has to do with the "Sustainable
Computing Consortium" (http://www.sustainablecomputing.org/) . They
seem to have overlapping charters, and both seem to be run for the
benifit of Carnigie Mellon.
--
T.E.D.
Home - mailto:dennison@telepath.com (Yahoo: Ted_Dennison)
Homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-17 17:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-05-16 6:14 High Dependability Computing Consortium Russ
2002-05-17 14:59 ` Jim Rogers
2002-05-17 17:20 ` Ted Dennison
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox