From: Freddy <Fred.Feuerstein@web.de>
Subject: Re: Why not MaRTE was Re: An OS in Ada, why not RTEMS ?
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 18:35:14 +0200
Date: 2002-05-12T18:35:14+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CDE99C2.C6CB780@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1103_1020738153@news.blueyonder.co.uk
Nick Roberts schrieb:
>
> Alfred,
>
> If you are talking about the requirements for AdaOS
> (and I'm not at all sure you are), then (to my mind)
> RTEMS falls short of far too many of our
> requirements.
Hi Nick,
as far I understood, Alfred talkes about "MaRTE OS". I'm not sure
whether it can fit the need for "AdaOS".
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-12 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-26 20:58 An OS in Ada, why not RTEMS ? sk
2002-04-28 7:45 ` James Ross
2002-04-28 11:18 ` sk
2002-04-28 21:48 ` James Ross
2002-04-28 23:12 ` Nick Roberts
2002-04-29 2:29 ` sk
2002-04-29 5:48 ` James Ross
2002-04-29 12:09 ` Sergey Koshcheyev
2002-04-30 5:33 ` James Ross
2002-04-30 15:59 ` Sergey Koshcheyev
2002-04-29 18:52 ` Bytes per character (was Re: An OS in Ada, why not RTEMS ?) Brian Catlin
2002-04-29 22:15 ` sk
2002-04-29 23:28 ` chris.danx
2002-04-29 22:51 ` sk
2002-04-28 21:13 ` An OS in Ada, why not RTEMS ? Nick Roberts
2002-04-29 0:34 ` James Ross
2002-04-29 5:19 ` Simon Wright
2002-04-30 6:53 ` James Ross
2002-04-30 16:03 ` Sergey Koshcheyev
2002-05-01 22:24 ` Simon Wright
2002-04-30 8:49 ` Why not MaRTE was " Alfred Hilscher
2002-04-30 14:08 ` sk
2002-05-07 2:22 ` Nick Roberts
2002-05-12 16:35 ` Freddy [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox