From: Wes Groleau <wesgroleau@despammed.com>
Subject: Re: Generation of permutations
Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 09:55:21 -0500
Date: 2002-05-01T09:55:21-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CD001D9.286614CC@despammed.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5ee5b646.0204301457.52a492c3@posting.google.com
> > -- The original author claimed no copyright. In order to protect
> > -- what seemed to be his intent, I am assigning copyright to the
> > -- Free Software Foundation with the condtions below. I reserve the
> > -- right to revoke this assignment if and when requested by the
> > -- original author.
>
> This doesn't sound like legal stuff (tedious or otherwise) to me, it sounds
> like a clear copyright violation. A lot of people (the writer of the above
> presumably included) are under the illusion that an author must explicitly
> "claim" copyright by including an explicit copyright message. This is totally
> false under current law. All material is copyrighted unless the author
> explicitly disclaims copyright.
Poorly worded, I'll grant you. He did not claim copyright, nor did he
disclaim it, unless you consider putting it on SIMTEL-20 (or allowing it
to be put there) to be releasing rights. He also did not reply to
e-mail
inquiries that did not bounce.
> Only the author of a piece of software can offer to assign the copyright
As the author of the changes, I could have put better wording
on it, true.
> By copying this software without taking the trouble to check on the status,
See above.
> copyright. At $50,000 each, the statutory penalty for copyright violation, it
> sounds like the author can get rich. :-) Note that it is not a defense to
Having been on the plaintiff's side, I can assure you that it
_is_ a defense to point out that the plaintiff knowingly ignored
numerous similar offenses before jumping on one of them.
(Although that was not "intellectual" property, so a court
could say the situation is different.
Last I heard, that applied in the U.S. IF it was registered at the
Library of Congress. Of course, the fine then was $10,000, so the
conditions may have also changed.
So, form your own opinion, take your own risk.
--
Wes Groleau
http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-01 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-29 11:54 Generation of permutations Reinert Korsnes
2002-04-30 13:52 ` Ted Dennison
2002-04-30 14:20 ` Marin David Condic
2002-05-02 12:32 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-02 15:47 ` Ted Dennison
2002-05-02 16:16 ` Mark Biggar
2002-05-03 13:04 ` Marin David Condic
2002-05-05 0:52 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-05 23:11 ` tmoran
2002-05-06 2:13 ` Chad R. Meiners
2002-05-06 13:52 ` Stephen Leake
2002-05-09 17:44 ` Darren New
2002-05-09 18:07 ` Stephen Leake
2002-05-09 20:58 ` Darren New
2002-05-09 23:21 ` tmoran
2002-05-09 23:51 ` Darren New
2002-05-10 3:37 ` tmoran
2002-05-10 3:59 ` Darren New
2002-05-10 13:13 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-25 16:21 ` Robert I. Eachus
2002-05-09 23:24 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-09 23:48 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-10 3:37 ` tmoran
2002-05-10 15:10 ` Chad R. Meiners
2002-05-11 4:04 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-16 1:35 ` Chad R. Meiners
2002-05-11 4:05 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-06 15:46 ` Wes Groleau
2002-05-06 16:21 ` Chad R. Meiners
2002-05-06 16:33 ` Darren New
2002-05-07 0:06 ` tmoran
2002-05-07 0:26 ` Darren New
2002-05-07 1:56 ` tmoran
2002-05-07 10:39 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-07 17:25 ` Chad R. Meiners
2002-05-08 2:27 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-08 8:44 ` Mats Karlssohn
2002-05-07 17:00 ` Wes Groleau
2002-05-06 21:33 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-06 17:26 ` Marin David Condic
2002-05-07 7:35 ` tmoran
2002-05-07 13:22 ` Marin David Condic
2002-05-08 5:23 ` tmoran
2002-05-08 14:10 ` Marin David Condic
2002-05-09 16:20 ` Darren New
2002-05-09 19:04 ` tmoran
2002-05-08 16:20 ` Darren New
2002-05-08 17:31 ` tmoran
2002-05-08 17:39 ` Chad R. Meiners
2002-05-07 15:34 ` Darren New
2002-05-07 17:44 ` Chad R. Meiners
2002-05-07 19:58 ` tmoran
2002-05-07 21:05 ` Turing-undecidable languages (OT) Chad R. Meiners
2002-05-08 8:24 ` Danx
2002-05-08 17:16 ` Chad R. Meiners
2002-05-10 2:37 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-08 9:16 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2002-05-08 17:18 ` Chad R. Meiners
2002-05-09 20:56 ` Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-05-09 16:18 ` Chad R. Meiners
2002-05-10 2:52 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-08 2:17 ` Generation of permutations Robert Dewar
2002-05-03 13:13 ` Ted Dennison
2002-05-03 13:24 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2002-04-30 15:06 ` Hyman Rosen
2002-05-01 8:40 ` Adrian Hoe
2002-05-01 19:53 ` Hyman Rosen
2002-05-11 1:52 ` Steven Deller
2002-05-02 16:24 ` Mark Biggar
2002-04-30 17:12 ` Wes Groleau
2002-04-30 22:57 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-01 0:54 ` tmoran
2002-05-01 9:42 ` Florian Weimer
2002-05-02 12:34 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-01 12:43 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-01 15:05 ` TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN Wes Groleau
2002-05-02 12:27 ` More on copyright, (Re: TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN) Robert Dewar
2002-05-08 13:56 ` Wes Groleau
2002-05-08 18:01 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-08 18:31 ` Hyman Rosen
2002-05-09 13:41 ` Wes Groleau
2002-05-01 12:46 ` Generation of permutations Robert Dewar
2002-05-01 18:22 ` OT:Copyright, was " tmoran
2002-05-01 21:56 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-01 23:45 ` tmoran
2002-05-02 11:58 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-01 14:55 ` Wes Groleau [this message]
2002-05-02 12:41 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox