From: Alfred Hilscher <Alfred.Hilscher@icn.siemens.de>
Subject: Why not MaRTE was Re: An OS in Ada, why not RTEMS ?
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 10:49:52 +0200
Date: 2002-04-30T10:49:52+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CCE5AB0.D02EA0A4@icn.siemens.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.1019948342.7875.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
sk wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have had time to "revisit" the EduOs-Ada project and
> during much needed research run accross RTEMS.
>
> A brief look at the RTEMS specs would suggest that
> RTEMS either meets most of the needs discussed in
> 2 or 3 years (at least) of threads in cla or is
> capable of supporting those needs.
>
> I am wondering why the contributors to the said
> threads do not regard RTEMS as a suitable OS to
> adopt as a platform for playing with ?
>
> Any insights appreciated, thanks.
>
> (RTEMS at => http://www.oarcorp.com/)
http://marte.unican.es/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-30 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-26 20:58 An OS in Ada, why not RTEMS ? sk
2002-04-28 7:45 ` James Ross
2002-04-28 11:18 ` sk
2002-04-28 21:48 ` James Ross
2002-04-28 23:12 ` Nick Roberts
2002-04-29 2:29 ` sk
2002-04-29 5:48 ` James Ross
2002-04-29 12:09 ` Sergey Koshcheyev
2002-04-30 5:33 ` James Ross
2002-04-30 15:59 ` Sergey Koshcheyev
2002-04-29 18:52 ` Bytes per character (was Re: An OS in Ada, why not RTEMS ?) Brian Catlin
2002-04-29 22:15 ` sk
2002-04-29 23:28 ` chris.danx
2002-04-29 22:51 ` sk
2002-04-28 21:13 ` An OS in Ada, why not RTEMS ? Nick Roberts
2002-04-29 0:34 ` James Ross
2002-04-29 5:19 ` Simon Wright
2002-04-30 6:53 ` James Ross
2002-04-30 16:03 ` Sergey Koshcheyev
2002-05-01 22:24 ` Simon Wright
2002-04-30 8:49 ` Alfred Hilscher [this message]
2002-04-30 14:08 ` Why not MaRTE was " sk
2002-05-07 2:22 ` Nick Roberts
2002-05-12 16:35 ` Freddy
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox