comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anatoly Chernyshev <rhezusfactor@yahoo.com>
Subject: Are rendezvous dead?
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 03:42:32 -0500
Date: 2002-04-14T03:42:32-05:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CB940F7.4EC50CFD@yahoo.com> (raw)

Hello, everybody,

I remember, a long time ago I did read a paper entitled like "Rendezvous
are dead. Long live protected object" where it was stated that protected
types are much more convenient for communication between tasks than
rendezvous. And also the rationale dwells mostly upon these types, not
rendezvous.
The question is: are there any practical instances (in Ada 95) when use
of rendezvous is more advantageous than of protected types? In other
words, is it worhty of trying to write the code using only protected
types and completely ignoring rendezvous as possible solution (like the
GOTO operator)?

Thanks in advance,
Anatoly




             reply	other threads:[~2002-04-14  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-14  8:42 Anatoly Chernyshev [this message]
2002-04-14 10:55 ` Are rendezvous dead? Dmitry A.Kazakov
2002-04-14 14:00 ` Pat Rogers
2002-04-15 13:38   ` Marin David Condic
2002-04-14 19:52 ` Robert Dewar
2002-04-16  8:48   ` John McCabe
2002-04-15 14:04 ` Ted Dennison
2002-04-15 16:09   ` Jim Rogers
2002-04-15 16:36     ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox