From: Wes Groleau <wesgroleau@despammed.com>
Subject: Re: alternatives
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 10:16:11 -0500
Date: 2002-03-15T10:16:11-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C92103B.589B7A82@despammed.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: JPlk8.66048$0Z4.2561548399@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com
> > >"... the Department of Defense, which was seeking alternatives to Ada ..."
> > >
> > >Who is The DoD , please ?
> >
> > Do you mean who is The Department of Defense?
>
> 1) The DoD does not act as a whole, with a consistent approach or goal (This
> will surprise no one familiar with Ada)
However, if one insists on pretending the DoD
is a coherent unit, the statement would be false.
The "DoD" is NOT "seeking alternatives" to Ada.
The "DoD" is merely acknowledging that the
language lemmings can't be stopped and are
merely trying to prevent them from carrying
the USA's safety into the sea with them.
--
Wes Groleau
http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-15 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-14 14:03 alternatives Peter Hermann
2002-03-15 9:25 ` alternatives John McCabe
2002-03-15 12:30 ` alternatives Pat Rogers
2002-03-15 15:16 ` Wes Groleau [this message]
2002-03-15 15:38 ` alternatives Mike Silva
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox