From: Jeffrey Carter <jeffrey.carter@boeing.com>
Subject: Re: Complexity of protected objects
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 20:04:45 GMT
Date: 2002-03-04T20:04:45+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C83D35D.30EA5284@boeing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5ee5b646.0203031136.5a77597a@posting.google.com
Robert Dewar wrote:
>
> Jeffrey Carter <jrcarter@acm.org> wrote in message news:<3C81C852.395A160A@acm.org>...
> > but as the start of the discussion
> > referred to calling Ada.Text_IO operations from protected
> > operations, I
> > didn't think the additional qualification was necessary.
>
> But it did not do so! The first message in this thread
> simply talked about reading and writing files, without
> any hint of how it should be done.
Now I've had to go to Google Groups to see how my memory is doing, and
of course Dewar is correct. But without any qualification on how to read
and write files, I think we should treat such posts to cla as referring
to language-defined I/O.
--
Jeffrey Carter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-04 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-25 16:28 Complexity of protected objects tony gair
2002-02-25 16:45 ` Marin David Condic
2002-03-03 1:11 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-03 4:13 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-03-03 19:50 ` Robert Dewar
2002-02-25 17:35 ` Jim Rogers
2002-02-28 22:09 ` Nick Roberts
2002-02-28 23:32 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-03-01 5:45 ` Jim Rogers
2002-03-03 0:59 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-01 17:42 ` Jeffrey Carter
2002-03-03 1:06 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-03 6:53 ` Jeffrey Carter
2002-03-03 19:36 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-04 20:04 ` Jeffrey Carter [this message]
2002-03-03 0:54 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-03 0:32 ` Robert Dewar
2002-02-25 22:01 ` Ted Dennison
2002-03-03 1:08 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-04 9:33 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2002-03-04 16:44 ` Ted Dennison
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox