comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Pilgrim <simon.pilgrim@baesystems.com>
Subject: Boeing 777 (WAS: naval systems)
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 17:31:29 +0000
Date: 2002-03-01T17:31:29+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C7FBAF1.A2D696FF@baesystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: a5lm53$6c9$1@knossos.btinternet.com



tony gair wrote:

> 2) The contract for the fly by wire system was completed by Marconi Avionics
> in Elstree, UK, who are mainly Ada programmers and normally do Big Guns
> projects. This probably decided the project language. The ready availability
> of design, and test tools used on Big Guns projects was possibly also a
> deciding factor.

As Dave stated in another reply, you are a bit wide of the mark there. 
Marconi Avionics has been through a few name changes and a merger, but
the flight controls has always been based in Rochester, Kent, UK.  We
are now part of BAE SYSTEMS, Avionic Systems Division.

We have been making civil and military flight control systems for many
years for aircraft such as Concorde, Eurofighter, Canadair RJ, Airbus
A320, UAVs and many more.  I believe it was this system knowledge and
our well-established relationship with Boeing, rather than any specific
language experience that influenced Boeing to select us.

> There were initially three different languages that were going to be used
> for the project, but this idea was scrapped in favour of exclusively using
> Ada.

The three languages were originally: C, Ada and PLM.  We now use a
subset of Ada, running on three different targets.

> Would you fly on this aircraft?

I have and I loved it.  I even stood under the flight path at the
airfield perimeter when the 777-200 took off for first flight (along
with several hundred other proud people).

The Boeing 777 was probably tested more than any other previous aircraft
before it left the ground, thanks to the enormous amount of simulation
work done.  You say you were present on the project testing phase, so
must have seen the huge investment Boeing made in the IASL (Integrated
Avionics Systems Laboratory?).  Also the huge amount of dedication and
professionalism from those involved.

If you wouldn't fly on the 777 because of safety concerns, you must live
in a bunker with a tin-foil beanie hat ;-)

-- 
Regards,
Simon Pilgrim
Civil Flight Controls, Rochester, UK
All views expressed are my own and not necessarily those of my employer.



      parent reply	other threads:[~2002-03-01 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <3C74E519.3F5349C4@baesystems.com>
     [not found] ` <20020221205157.05542.00000012@mb-cm.news.cs.com>
2002-02-22 12:19   ` naval systems David Gillon
2002-02-22 14:55     ` Marin David Condic
2002-02-23  5:54       ` David Starner
2002-02-25 15:05         ` Marin David Condic
2002-02-26  2:34           ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-02-26 17:44           ` David Starner
2002-02-26 19:49             ` Pat Rogers
2002-02-26 19:55               ` Ray Blaak
2002-02-26 20:46                 ` Pat Rogers
2002-02-26 22:41                   ` Ray Blaak
2002-02-27  0:02                     ` Pat Rogers
2002-02-27  5:01                       ` David Starner
2002-02-27  9:38                         ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2002-02-27 19:48                         ` compiler benchmark comparisons (was: naval systems) Wes Groleau
2002-02-27 21:51                           ` Pat Rogers
2002-03-01  2:04                             ` David Starner
2002-03-01  4:06                               ` Pat Rogers
2002-02-27 23:53                           ` Gary Barnes
2002-02-28  2:19                             ` Dan Andreatta
2002-02-28 10:04                               ` Jerry van Dijk
2002-02-28 13:35                               ` compiler benchmark comparisons Georg Bauhaus
2002-02-28 18:12                                 ` Dan Andreatta
2002-03-01  5:07                                   ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-01 16:43                                     ` Dan Andreatta
2002-03-01 23:17                                     ` Dan Andreatta
2002-03-01 23:40                                       ` tmoran
2002-02-28 14:18                               ` compiler benchmark comparisons (was: naval systems) Wes Groleau
2002-02-28 14:31                               ` Ted Dennison
2002-02-28 18:33                                 ` Dan Andreatta
2002-02-28 21:14                                 ` Wes Groleau
2002-02-28 14:01                             ` Wes Groleau
2002-03-01 22:01                               ` Randy Brukardt
2002-02-28 15:58                             ` Larry Kilgallen
     [not found]                             ` <338040f8.0202271819.373f733a@Organization: LJK Software <TgAW8WWqYgP5@eisner.encompasserve.org>
2002-03-01 19:29                               ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-02 11:12                                 ` Pascal Obry
2002-03-02 19:49                                   ` Richard Riehle
     [not found]                               ` <5ee5b646.0203011129.1bdbac56@po <ug03ji5ow.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
2002-03-02 18:20                                 ` Simon Wright
2002-02-27  2:28                   ` naval systems David Starner
2002-02-27 21:44                     ` Pat Rogers
2002-03-01  2:59                       ` David Starner
2002-03-01 15:33                         ` Pat Rogers
2002-03-01 17:22                       ` Jeffrey Carter
2002-03-03  5:21                         ` David Starner
2002-02-26 22:40                 ` Pascal Obry
2002-02-27  0:42               ` David Starner
2002-02-23 19:18       ` John R. Strohm
2002-02-23 18:36         ` martin.m.dowie
2002-02-25 15:10         ` Marin David Condic
2002-02-28 16:33     ` tony gair
2002-02-28 17:33       ` David Gillon
2002-02-28 21:18       ` Wes Groleau
2002-03-01 17:31       ` Simon Pilgrim [this message]
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox