Re: [Thanks] Why is 'Adjust' not called here ???

[Didier Pieroux <dpieroux@hotmail.com>]

Pat Rogers wrote:

> > Because the RM says so :). Pat Rogers gave the RM references.


Dear Pat and Stephen,

Thanks to you !

By the way, by reading your answers I discovered that the reason for me
not finding the correct reference was that I was using the "On-line
version of the Ada 95 Rationale at AdaPower.com" which is clearly
missing the "Implementation Requirements" you refer to.  So I guess that
it is not up to date and misses the last corrections. Hough !

Now, I know it is better to consult
"www.ada-auth.org/arm-html/RM-TOC.html" instead ;-)

Best regards,
Didier


-- 
     _________________________________________________________________ 

     Didier Pieroux
     Theoretical Nonlinear Optics, CP 231
     Physics Department, Universite Libre de Bruxelles
     Bvd du Triomphe, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium

     Phone: ++ 32 2 650 5903, Fax: ++ 32 2 650 5824
     http://www.ulb.ac.be/sciences/ont/en.html 
     _________________________________________________________________