From: Darren New <dnew@san.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Assertions in the Next Ada Standard
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 01:30:54 GMT
Date: 2002-01-12T01:30:54+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C3F91A5.7DA5CB10@san.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: a1o2gu$sfe3f$3@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de
Nick Roberts wrote:
> This procedure demonstrates how pre-conditions, post-conditions, invariants,
> and assumptions can all be programmed in existing Ada.
Except for the inheritance rules. It's a bit more complicated than you
can do with in-line code, in exactly the same way that throwing
exceptions and returning error-code values are different.
(Note that you also forgot to check the invariant upon entry. Except for
routines that initialize limited variables. Etc.)
--
Darren New
San Diego, CA, USA (PST). Cryptokeys on demand.
The opposite of always is sometimes.
The opposite of never is sometimes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-12 1:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-11 6:20 Assertions in the Next Ada Standard Richard Riehle
2002-01-11 9:23 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-01-11 13:47 ` Robert A Duff
2002-01-11 23:28 ` Nick Roberts
2002-01-12 1:30 ` Darren New [this message]
2002-01-11 20:07 ` FGD
2002-01-11 20:39 ` Wes Groleau
2002-01-12 4:56 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-12 7:30 ` Richard Riehle
2002-01-12 19:58 ` FGD
2002-01-12 21:27 ` Ed Falis
2002-01-12 22:45 ` Darren New
2002-01-14 17:20 ` Robert A Duff
2002-01-14 17:42 ` Darren New
2002-01-14 23:16 ` Mark Lundquist
2002-01-17 6:23 ` Richard Riehle
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox