From: Richard Riehle <richard@adaworks.com>
Subject: Assertions in the Next Ada Standard
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 22:20:40 -0800
Date: 2002-01-11T06:19:11+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C3E8438.E780D942@adaworks.com> (raw)
I raised this question several months ago and it seems
to have failed to catch any sustained interest. The subject
came up again in a phone conversation with ARG member,
Randy Brukardt.
According to Randy, we need a well-crafted proposal to present
to the next ARG meeting in February. I seem to recall that some
people were already working on this. Has there been any progress?
Will the proposal be ready for the next ARG meeting?
I am willing to participate in the proposal development process,
and I am sure there are others who would do so. However, I
understand that someone has already started it, and there is no
point in having multiple conflicting proposals.
I am hoping to see something like pre-conditions, post-conditions,
and invariants in the next revision of Ada. I would be pleased if
we simply adopted the wording already used in Eiffel: require,
ensure, and invariant, but I am not intractable about the terminology.
So, who is working on the proposal for this?
Richard Riehle
next reply other threads:[~2002-01-11 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-11 6:20 Richard Riehle [this message]
2002-01-11 9:23 ` Assertions in the Next Ada Standard Dale Stanbrough
2002-01-11 13:47 ` Robert A Duff
2002-01-11 23:28 ` Nick Roberts
2002-01-12 1:30 ` Darren New
2002-01-11 20:07 ` FGD
2002-01-11 20:39 ` Wes Groleau
2002-01-12 4:56 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-12 7:30 ` Richard Riehle
2002-01-12 19:58 ` FGD
2002-01-12 21:27 ` Ed Falis
2002-01-12 22:45 ` Darren New
2002-01-14 17:20 ` Robert A Duff
2002-01-14 17:42 ` Darren New
2002-01-14 23:16 ` Mark Lundquist
2002-01-17 6:23 ` Richard Riehle
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox