From: Mark Johnson <Mark_H_Johnson@Raytheon.com>
Subject: Re: Next public release of GNAT(?)
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 12:30:56 -0600
Date: 2002-01-09T12:30:56-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C3C8C60.1046F567@Raytheon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: u666b1oqw.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov
Stephen Leake wrote:
> [snip]
> No, the whole point of the gcc tree is that it is at gcc 3.0, and the
> Ada code builds on that. This will be the basis of the ACT 3.15
> release.
>
That statement may not be true. I'm running a 3.15w (wavefront) from ACT
and it is still built on gcc --version still says 2.8.1. If past history
is a guide, that will be the basis of the supported release 3.15a (and
presumably the public version).
I have yet to see any wavefronts from ACT built on gcc 3.0. Of course,
time will tell.
--Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-09 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-09 7:58 Next public release of GNAT(?) Frank
2002-01-09 9:11 ` Gerhard Häring
2002-01-09 9:25 ` Jean-Marc Bourguet
2002-01-09 16:19 ` Stephen Leake
2002-01-09 17:32 ` Jean-Marc Bourguet
2002-01-10 1:49 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-09 18:30 ` Mark Johnson [this message]
2002-01-10 1:54 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-09 19:32 ` Florian Weimer
2002-01-09 20:22 ` Stephen Leake
2002-01-10 1:56 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-15 14:50 ` Dale Pontius
2002-01-15 17:09 ` Preben Randhol
2002-01-15 17:17 ` Jean-Marc Bourguet
2002-01-15 20:33 ` Florian Weimer
2002-01-15 21:08 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-10 1:47 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-10 1:44 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-09 16:16 ` Stephen Leake
2002-01-10 2:03 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-10 7:27 ` Britt Snodgrass
2002-01-12 10:31 ` Frank
2002-01-15 3:55 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-10 1:42 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-11 11:59 ` Larry Kilgallen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox