From: Jeffrey Carter <jeffrey.carter@boeing.com>
Subject: Re: ASCL project on AdaPower.net
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 16:01:15 GMT
Date: 2001-12-04T16:01:15+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C0CF34B.89719EDB@boeing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Vo5P7.48258$xS6.79012@www.newsranger.com
Ted Dennison wrote:
>
> >At this point it would probably be most productive to ignore 9-13 and
> >reach a consensus on 4. Then we should agree of a package specification
>
> Personally, I think we allready have it on 4. The idea is that there is no
> synchronization provided in the facility, but things are made reentrant and it
> works with tasks at least as well as Ada.Text_IO does. I think that is what he
> was trying to express in 4 (at least I hope so). I wasn't aware that any further
> discussion was needed on this point.
You're right. I got my numbers mixed up. The one without consensus yet
is 2 (lists must be 100% safe).
Sorry for the confusion.
--
Jeffrey Carter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-04 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-02 5:56 ASCL project on AdaPower.net Nick Roberts
2001-12-02 10:53 ` Pascal Obry
2001-12-02 11:37 ` Preben Randhol
2001-12-02 12:23 ` Preben Randhol
2001-12-02 17:55 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-12-03 21:23 ` Nick Roberts
2001-12-04 2:39 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-12-06 17:56 ` Nick Roberts
2001-12-03 14:56 ` Ted Dennison
2001-12-03 16:54 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-12-03 18:59 ` Ted Dennison
2001-12-03 21:27 ` Nick Roberts
2001-12-10 16:12 ` Marin David Condic
2001-12-03 15:49 ` Ted Dennison
2001-12-03 22:29 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-12-04 14:50 ` Ted Dennison
2001-12-04 16:01 ` Jeffrey Carter [this message]
2001-12-04 17:20 ` Ted Dennison
2001-12-04 20:43 ` Stephen Leake
2001-12-04 20:41 ` Stephen Leake
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox