From: Darren New <dnew@san.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Small question concerning use
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 02:48:55 GMT
Date: 2001-10-17T02:48:55+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BCCF185.A4512DDA@san.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: t74z7.24113$gT6.15012072@news1.rdc1.sfba.home.com
tmoran@acm.org wrote:
> OTOH, Ada.Streams.Stream_Element_Count was clearly designed with the
> intention of "use Ada.Streams", in which case Stream_Element_Count
> is very readable, while Ada.Streams.Stream_Element_Count is ugly.
Right. My thought was that "always avoid use - it leads to ambiguities"
is too sweeping a statement in the face of this sort of naming
convention.
Hmm... The hardest part of Ada for me seems to be naming conventions, at
least so far. Is this good or bad? :-)
--
Darren New
San Diego, CA, USA (PST). Cryptokeys on demand.
Who is this Dr. Ibid anyway,
and how does he know so much?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-17 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-15 22:28 Small question concerning use Eric Merritt
2001-10-16 6:34 ` Rename is much better Petter Fryklund
2001-10-16 12:28 ` Small question concerning use Marc A. Criley
2001-10-16 13:27 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-16 19:31 ` Darren New
2001-10-16 20:26 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-16 21:26 ` David Starner
2001-10-17 0:18 ` tmoran
2001-10-17 2:48 ` Darren New [this message]
2001-10-17 10:52 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-10-17 13:48 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-17 14:21 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-16 20:35 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-16 13:54 ` Marin David Condic
2001-10-18 18:46 ` Dr. Michael Paus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox