From: James Rogers <jimmaureenrogers@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: why? US Army Ada software converted to C++?
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2001 22:00:22 GMT
Date: 2001-10-07T22:00:22+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BC0D083.546674E5@worldnet.att.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20011007141253.G6134-100000@shell5.ba.best.com
Brian Rogoff wrote:
>
> Indeed. And all of this talk of switching to C++ for weapons systems is
> scary. I guess we can be thankful that the DOD hasn't switched to Perl,
> yet...
Not Perl, but there has been movement toward Java.
Jim Rogers
Colorado Springs, Colorado USA
(One of those less desirable locales, and let's keep it that way.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-07 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-06 21:56 why? US Army Ada software converted to C++? rob
2001-10-06 23:35 ` David Emery
2001-10-07 1:16 ` Jim44.
2001-10-07 7:31 ` tmoran
2001-10-07 21:22 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-10-07 22:00 ` James Rogers [this message]
2001-10-07 23:59 ` Dale Stanbrough
2001-10-08 0:10 ` Preben Randhol
2001-10-09 18:12 ` Marin David Condic
2001-10-09 19:05 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-09 20:36 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-10-09 22:01 ` Marin David Condic
2001-10-07 1:49 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-10-07 12:09 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-10-09 16:03 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-08 0:28 ` Richard Riehle
2001-10-08 0:39 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-10-08 3:26 ` Pi
2001-10-09 16:06 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-08 10:41 ` Petter Fryklund
2001-10-08 13:20 ` Alfred Hilscher
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox