From: Jeffrey Carter <jrcarter@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Access types and classwide programming
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 06:19:42 GMT
Date: 2001-09-16T06:19:42+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BA4447B.66842AB0@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 09Oo7.12082$mj6.1852826@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com
"chris.danx" wrote:
>
> This is for a program which *in future* will use address to access
> conversions (for hardware programming), so it has to be access types. It's
> not neccessary for it to use address to access conversions as no hardware
> access is necessary at this point but it will do in the future.
Frequently, address clauses are a better approach to hardware
programming than address to access conversions.
--
Jeff Carter
"We call your door-opening request a silly thing."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-16 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-15 19:36 Access types and classwide programming chris.danx
2001-09-15 20:28 ` chris.danx
2001-09-15 23:42 ` [Different Topic] Endianess? chris.danx
2001-09-16 6:22 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-09-17 7:37 ` Juanma Barranquero
2001-09-17 7:53 ` Assigning the value of a deferred constant? Juanma Barranquero
2001-09-17 14:04 ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-17 14:36 ` Juanma Barranquero
2001-09-17 17:36 ` tmoran
2001-09-18 8:16 ` Juanma Barranquero
2001-09-18 18:40 ` Richard Riehle
2001-09-19 2:07 ` Vincent Marciante
2001-09-19 7:39 ` Juanma Barranquero
2001-09-16 6:19 ` Jeffrey Carter [this message]
2001-09-16 13:37 ` Access types and classwide programming chris.danx
2001-09-16 16:49 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-09-16 18:24 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2001-09-17 6:15 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-09-17 4:57 ` tmoran
2001-09-17 14:16 ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-16 9:32 ` tmoran
2001-09-17 9:41 ` John McCabe
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox