From: Ken Burtch <kburtch@sympatico.ca>
Subject: Re: Variable sizes for record fields
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 17:36:03 -0400
Date: 2001-08-17T17:36:03-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B7D8E43.A3FDBBA9@sympatico.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3B7D6E0B.19366C2A@home.com
"Warren W. Gay VE3WWG" wrote:
> Another hint :
>
> For records that have arrays sized by discriminant(s), it is best to declare
> those arrays starting from 1. Otherwise you'll have sizing difficulties, because
> you won't be able to use an expression within the array range to compute the
> last subscript, within the range.
Nor will you be able to declare a null array using a range of 1..0.
--
Ken O. Burtch: System Manager in a Box / Lintel : Pegasoft
http://www.vaxxine.com/pegasoft : R.R.#1
Bio: 35;Bsc,UI,Lang,Games;Toons,Elves,SF,Pizza;Xian : Jordan Station,
ON
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Canada L0R 1S0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-17 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-13 6:06 C-style 'union' in Ada? Brian Catlin
2001-08-13 7:34 ` tmoran
2001-08-14 3:09 ` DuckE
2001-08-14 3:49 ` Brian Catlin
2001-08-14 7:37 ` Martin Dowie
2001-08-14 9:39 ` Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
2001-08-14 11:49 ` Martin Dowie
2001-08-14 13:38 ` Ted Dennison
2001-08-16 22:35 ` David Brown
2001-08-17 3:14 ` Brian Catlin
2001-08-17 14:44 ` Ted Dennison
2001-08-17 16:38 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-08-17 18:17 ` Ted Dennison
2001-08-17 18:45 ` Samuel T. Harris
2001-08-17 3:18 ` Variable sizes for record fields (was: C-style 'union' in Ada) Larry Kilgallen
2001-08-17 6:34 ` Variable sizes for record fields David Brown
2001-08-17 10:44 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-08-17 19:18 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2001-08-17 21:36 ` Ken Burtch [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox