From: John Poltorak <jp@eyup.org>
Subject: Re: ADA for OS/2
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 14:29:56 +0100
Date: 2001-07-07T14:29:56+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B470ED2.9CA17CBE@eyup.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Ej0w7lFo08Zw-pn2-uCtRxTNVD6K6@jupiter.dwparsons.dialin.t-online.de
Dave Parsons wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2001 15:41:58, Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com> wrote:
>
> > I think that once Gnat is in the GCC baseline (RSN, right?), its perfectly
> > reasonable to expect the community to build its own binaries for *all*
> > platforms, as well as to coordinate releases, etc. If ACT feels its in their
> > best interests to contribute to that effort, then great. But they are a
> > *company* and its about time we quit expecting them to do tons of stuff for us
> > for free, just because we'd like it.
> >
>
> True, but since the OS/2 code is still in the baseline presumably it
> is tested and the results of the tests would include an OS/2 binary
> which would in turn have to be tested.
> If that is true, why not release it, or is the OS/2 code not tested
> anymore?
> If it is not tested, what does that mean for the quality of any private
> builds?
This sounds like a moot point since no one apart, from the GNAT developers, appears
to be able to build an OS/2 version...
--
John
>
> --
> Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-07 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-03 7:11 ADA for OS/2 John Poltorak
2001-07-03 9:35 ` David W. Noon
2001-07-03 10:56 ` John Poltorak
2001-07-03 19:09 ` tmoran
2001-07-03 20:47 ` John Poltorak
2001-07-30 3:20 ` Robert Dewar
2001-07-30 13:41 ` Ted Dennison
2001-07-30 16:51 ` tmoran
2001-07-04 9:49 ` Matthias Kretschmer
2001-07-04 13:41 ` John Poltorak
2001-07-05 13:11 ` Stephen Leake
2001-07-05 15:10 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-07-05 21:41 ` Robert Dewar
2001-07-06 2:51 ` Windows.Only.Vendors
2001-07-06 15:18 ` Ted Dennison
2001-07-06 15:52 ` John Poltorak
2001-07-07 21:06 ` Robert Dewar
2001-07-06 17:29 ` ADA for OS/2 [Specific question] Windows.Only.Vendors
2001-07-06 18:07 ` Ted Dennison
2001-07-06 20:36 ` Florian Weimer
2001-07-06 18:28 ` John Poltorak
2001-07-06 15:41 ` ADA for OS/2 Ted Dennison
2001-07-07 12:12 ` Dave Parsons
2001-07-07 13:29 ` John Poltorak [this message]
2001-07-08 11:04 ` Ada " Dave Parsons
2001-07-07 21:26 ` ADA " Robert Dewar
2001-07-29 10:45 ` Ada " Dave Parsons
2001-07-29 17:49 ` Windows.Only.Vendors
2001-07-30 5:09 ` Dave Parsons
2001-08-05 16:10 ` Robert Dewar
2001-08-05 17:48 ` Windows.Only.Vendors
2001-08-07 22:43 ` Robert Dewar
2001-08-07 7:06 ` Dave Parsons
2001-08-07 22:45 ` Robert Dewar
2001-08-09 6:17 ` Dave Parsons
2001-08-09 18:23 ` Robert Dewar
2001-08-11 5:20 ` Dave Parsons
2001-08-12 1:15 ` Robert Dewar
2001-07-05 20:57 ` ADA " John Poltorak
2001-07-06 17:36 ` David W. Noon
2001-07-06 18:23 ` John Poltorak
2001-07-07 1:51 ` Stefan Skoglund
2001-07-07 8:52 ` Pascal Obry
2001-07-07 21:21 ` Robert Dewar
2001-07-08 8:53 ` Pascal Obry
2001-07-05 19:43 ` Robert Dewar
2001-07-05 20:32 ` John Poltorak
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-01-23 0:00 Ada " Paul Cass
2000-01-25 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
[not found] <5ovqj1$4ul$1@unlisys.unlisys.net>
[not found] ` <5p06jo$c1r$2@elektron.et.tudelft.nl>
[not found] ` <5p38a7$2df$2@unlisys.unlisys.net>
[not found] ` <5p93ov$9ro@news.mr.net>
[not found] ` <5p9tpm$e90$1@unlisys.unlisys.net>
1997-07-01 0:00 ` Ada for OS/2 (was Re: Linux faster than OS/2...) system
1997-07-03 0:00 ` Geert Bosch
1997-07-04 0:00 ` Haug Buerger
1997-07-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-08-18 0:00 ` Ada for OS/2 Geert Bosch
1997-08-19 0:00 ` Tarjei T. Jensen
1997-08-19 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox