From: Wes Groleau <wwgrol@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com>
Subject: Re: Calling all language lawyers....
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:29:34 -0500
Date: 2001-06-11T16:29:34-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B25383E.CD573ADE@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3B1E34E1.70D8BD0@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com
Wes Groleau wrote:
> Is there anything anywhere that prohibits using a subtype
> in pragma Convention? I've dug around in Annex B in the
> RM & AARM and found no such language. (Nor did I find any
> requiring it to be supported.)
Thanks, all. That makes it clear that the accepting compiler
is wrong.
--
Wes Groleau
http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-11 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-06 13:49 Calling all language lawyers Wes Groleau
2001-06-06 15:52 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-06-06 16:10 ` Tucker Taft
2001-06-06 17:20 ` Adam Beneschan
2001-06-11 21:29 ` Wes Groleau [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox