From: Jon S Anthony <jsa@synquiry.com>
Subject: Re: smalltalk vs. Ada
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 21:26:43 -0400
Date: 2001-06-07T21:26:43-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B2029D3.26E2@synquiry.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: f7ce0059.0106071420.2f38d37a@posting.google.com
Rod Weston wrote:
>
> Still investigating OOP languages. I'm quite impressed with Ada, from
> what I've seen and read so far, but now want to turn my attention to
> smalltalk. Any ideas on how Ada and smalltalk compare? Are there any
> other OOP languages worth looking at?
Common Lisp and CLOS. In terms of sophistication, industrial strength,
and unparalleled flexibility combined with high efficiency,nothing else
available really matches it.
BTW, I think both Ada and Smalltalk are worthy.
/Jon
--
Jon Anthony
Synquiry Technologies, Ltd. Belmont, MA 02478, 617.484.3383
"Nightmares - Ha! The way my life's been going lately,
Who'd notice?" -- Londo Mollari
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-08 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-07 22:20 smalltalk vs. Ada Rod Weston
2001-06-07 22:27 ` Ed Falis
2001-06-08 0:32 ` Gary Scott
2001-06-07 22:46 ` Aron Felix Gurski
2001-06-08 1:26 ` Jon S Anthony [this message]
2001-06-08 14:16 ` Marin David Condic
2001-06-08 20:17 ` Mark Lundquist
2001-06-08 22:01 ` Wes Groleau
2001-06-08 23:03 ` Chris Campbell
2001-06-09 11:11 ` Gerhard Häring
2001-06-08 22:08 ` Ed Falis
2001-06-09 7:36 ` Pascal Obry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox