From: Gary Scott <scottg@flash.net>
Subject: Re: smalltalk vs. Ada
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 19:32:26 -0500
Date: 2001-06-07T19:32:26-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B201D1A.E694745C@flash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3B1FFFEC.2544571@mediaone.net
Hi,
You can review OO Fortran here:
http://www.j3-fortran.org/Fortran-200x.html
Ed Falis wrote:
>
> Rod Weston wrote:
>
> > Still investigating OOP languages. I'm quite impressed with Ada, from
> > what I've seen and read so far, but now want to turn my attention to
> > smalltalk. Any ideas on how Ada and smalltalk compare? Are there any
> > other OOP languages worth looking at?
>
> They're birds of quite different feathers - and both worth familiarizing
> yourself with. Sticking just to OO, I'd also take a look at Eiffel. For
> scripting, Ruby. And in functional languages, Haskell is worth a look,
> too.
>
> Language exploration can be a lifetime pasttime.
>
> - Ed
--
Gary Scott
mailto:scottg@flash.net
mailto:webmaster@fortranlib.com
http://www.fortranlib.com
Support the GNU Fortran G95 Project: http://g95.sourceforge.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-08 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-07 22:20 smalltalk vs. Ada Rod Weston
2001-06-07 22:27 ` Ed Falis
2001-06-08 0:32 ` Gary Scott [this message]
2001-06-07 22:46 ` Aron Felix Gurski
2001-06-08 1:26 ` Jon S Anthony
2001-06-08 14:16 ` Marin David Condic
2001-06-08 20:17 ` Mark Lundquist
2001-06-08 22:01 ` Wes Groleau
2001-06-08 23:03 ` Chris Campbell
2001-06-09 11:11 ` Gerhard Häring
2001-06-08 22:08 ` Ed Falis
2001-06-09 7:36 ` Pascal Obry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox